File:  [local] / rpl / README
Revision 1.3: download - view: text, annotated - select for diffs - revision graph
Wed Mar 17 15:12:37 2010 UTC (14 years, 1 month ago) by bertrand
Branches: MAIN
CVS tags: rpl-4_0_13, HEAD
Informations touchant à la compilation d'OpenSSL.

    1: ================================================================================
    2:     RPL/2 (R)
    3: ================================================================================
    4: 
    5: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    6:     WARNING :
    7: 
    8:     LESSTIF IS BROKEN AND CORRUPTS HEAP. PLEASE, DO NOT USE LESSTIF INSTEAD
    9:     REGULAR MOTIF LIBRARIES!
   10: 
   11:     I SHALL NOT ACCEPT ANY BUG REPORT FROM USERS THAT HAVE BUILD RPL/2 WITH
   12:     LESSTIF LIBRAIRIES SINCE OPENMOTIF IS AVAILABLE.
   13: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   14: 
   15:     RPL/2 signifies Reverse Polish Lisp/2. This language is obvious derivated
   16: from the first RPL written by Hewlett-Packard for its 28S calculator. Thus,
   17: this language is a half-compiled high level language which can perform
   18: symbolic and scientific computations.
   19: 
   20: 
   21:   * OpenSSL issue :
   22: 
   23:     OpenSSL does not use any configure script. If build process aborts on
   24: error related to OpenSSL, you shall try to build OpenSSL before running
   25: 'make'. On some system, OpenSSL configure script is unable to set compiler
   26: flags.
   27: 
   28:   * RPL/2 is known to run on :
   29: 
   30:     - Linux (kernel 2.6.12 and above) on i386, amd64, ppc32, sparc32,
   31:         sparc64, alpha. Test distribution is Debian. Warning, you have to
   32:         use NPTL, not LinuxThreads due to a bug in sem_post() that is not
   33:         async safe.
   34:     - Solaris 9 and above on i386, amd64, sparc32 (only Solaris 9) and sparc64.
   35:         It can be built out of the box on Solaris in a 32bits userland. For a
   36:         64bits executable, you have to modify some generated makefiles or
   37:         specify some options. See 64bits on Solaris.
   38:     - FreeBSD 7.x on i386. I have installed a FreeBSD 7.0, upgraded to 7.2
   39:          and RPL/2 ran without any trouble. RPL/2 does not run on FreeBSD 8.0
   40:         because sig_into_t struct is not filled. Someone has reported that
   41:         FreeBSD 7.2 did not filled this struct too...
   42:     - NetBSD 4.0 and above on sparc32 with a restriction. NetBSD's sigpending
   43:         is broken and it is impossible to use DETACH intrinsic. Bug report
   44:         has been done and this bug should be fixed in next NetBSD release.
   45:         Sigpending has been fixed in NetBSD 5.0 and RPL/2 runs fine.
   46: 
   47:   * RPL/2 should run on :
   48: 
   49:     - HP-UX (10.20 and above), but not tested for a long time.
   50:     - Linux (2.6.12 and above) on ppc64 and other hardware (arm, hppa...) or
   51:         with other distributions than Debian.
   52:     - FreeBSD 7.0 and above on other architecture than i386. Please not
   53:         that I cannot reproduce sig_info_t bug and I do not have more
   54:         information.
   55:     - NetBSD 4.0 and above on other architecture than sparc32 with restriction
   56:         due to sigpending bug.
   57:     - Mac OS X.
   58: 
   59:     Any information about RPL/2 on these last operating systems are welcome.
   60: 
   61:   * RPL/2 is not supported on :
   62: 
   63:     - OpenBSD due to a major bug in sigaltstack syscall when a program is
   64:         linked with -lthread. As this bug comes from OpenBSD libraries,
   65:         OpenBSD port has to wait for a fixed sigaltstack.
   66:     - OpenVMS (work in progress) on Alpha and Integrity due to some bugs in GNV.
   67:         RPL/2 never works on OpenVMS VAX because GNV is too old on this
   68:         architecture.
   69:     - Hurd.
   70: 
   71:   * RPL/2 shall never be supported on :
   72: 
   73:     - Cygwin due to some troubles between Cygwin Posix subsystem and Windows.
   74:         You can try, but I shall never support Cygwin. If someone proposes
   75:         patches to build RPL/2 on Cygwin, I won't modify official RPL/2 source
   76:         tree, but only propose these patches against official tarball.
   77:     - Windows (all versions).
   78:     - OS/2 and eComStation.
   79:     - Mac OS preX.
   80: 
   81:     Tools directory contains some libraries that are normally provided by
   82:     all Posix systems. These libraries are built during build process
   83:     and RPL/2 is statically linked with them because I have seen that on
   84:     several systems, some Posix libraries have strange 'features'...
   85: 
   86:     On all systems, you must install GNU make and you should install
   87:     gcc/g++/gfortran (minimal release : 4.0.0). It is possible to build
   88:     RPL/2 with some other compilers (for example cc and f95 from SunStudio,
   89:     or cc and f95 from Digital^WCompaq^WHP) but I do not test all potential
   90:     combinaisons.
   91: 
   92:   * 64 bits on Solaris (are you sure that you need 64bits wide RPL/2 ?)
   93: 
   94:     You have to configure RPL/2 with some user defined variables.
   95: 
   96:     CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -m64" CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -m64" FCFLAGS="$FCFLAGS -m64" \
   97:             FFLAGS="$FFLAGS -m64" LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -m64" ./configure (options)
   98: 
   99:     If you want to use mysql or postgresql support, you should obtain 64bits
  100:     binary executables, libraries and daemons. PostgreSQL 8.3.5 does not compile
  101:     on Solaris 10 in 64bits mode with gcc/GNU ld (due to a strange bug, ld
  102:     tries to build a 32bits wide library with 64bits objects even if -m64 is
  103:     specified on command line...). I have not tried mysql.
  104: 
  105:     If you want to use rplc, you have to use GNU ld, not Solaris ld, due to
  106:     another bug that avoid symbol exportation. You have to check that rpl
  107:     is linked with libmtmalloc and not with libmalloc from libc because there
  108:     is another bug in Solaris' libc : free() can enter in a deadlock
  109:     (internal locked mutex).
  110: 
  111:     Of course, all 64bits libraries have to be accessible by LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  112: 
  113: tchaikovski:[/usr/shared-apps/bin] > file rpl
  114: rpl: ELF 64-bit MSB executable SPARCV9 Version 1, dynamically linked,
  115:      not stripped
  116: 
  117:     Very easy^Wnice, isn't it ?
  118: 
  119:     J. Bertrand <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>

CVSweb interface <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>