Annotation of rpl/README, revision 1.3
1.1 bertrand 1: ================================================================================
2: RPL/2 (R)
3: ================================================================================
4:
5: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6: WARNING :
7:
8: LESSTIF IS BROKEN AND CORRUPTS HEAP. PLEASE, DO NOT USE LESSTIF INSTEAD
9: REGULAR MOTIF LIBRARIES!
10:
11: I SHALL NOT ACCEPT ANY BUG REPORT FROM USERS THAT HAVE BUILD RPL/2 WITH
12: LESSTIF LIBRAIRIES SINCE OPENMOTIF IS AVAILABLE.
13: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14:
15: RPL/2 signifies Reverse Polish Lisp/2. This language is obvious derivated
16: from the first RPL written by Hewlett-Packard for its 28S calculator. Thus,
17: this language is a half-compiled high level language which can perform
18: symbolic and scientific computations.
19:
1.3 ! bertrand 20:
! 21: * OpenSSL issue :
! 22:
! 23: OpenSSL does not use any configure script. If build process aborts on
! 24: error related to OpenSSL, you shall try to build OpenSSL before running
! 25: 'make'. On some system, OpenSSL configure script is unable to set compiler
! 26: flags.
! 27:
1.1 bertrand 28: * RPL/2 is known to run on :
29:
30: - Linux (kernel 2.6.12 and above) on i386, amd64, ppc32, sparc32,
31: sparc64, alpha. Test distribution is Debian. Warning, you have to
32: use NPTL, not LinuxThreads due to a bug in sem_post() that is not
33: async safe.
34: - Solaris 9 and above on i386, amd64, sparc32 (only Solaris 9) and sparc64.
35: It can be built out of the box on Solaris in a 32bits userland. For a
1.2 bertrand 36: 64bits executable, you have to modify some generated makefiles or
37: specify some options. See 64bits on Solaris.
38: - FreeBSD 7.x on i386. I have installed a FreeBSD 7.0, upgraded to 7.2
39: and RPL/2 ran without any trouble. RPL/2 does not run on FreeBSD 8.0
40: because sig_into_t struct is not filled. Someone has reported that
41: FreeBSD 7.2 did not filled this struct too...
1.1 bertrand 42: - NetBSD 4.0 and above on sparc32 with a restriction. NetBSD's sigpending
43: is broken and it is impossible to use DETACH intrinsic. Bug report
44: has been done and this bug should be fixed in next NetBSD release.
1.2 bertrand 45: Sigpending has been fixed in NetBSD 5.0 and RPL/2 runs fine.
1.1 bertrand 46:
47: * RPL/2 should run on :
48:
49: - HP-UX (10.20 and above), but not tested for a long time.
50: - Linux (2.6.12 and above) on ppc64 and other hardware (arm, hppa...) or
51: with other distributions than Debian.
1.2 bertrand 52: - FreeBSD 7.0 and above on other architecture than i386. Please not
53: that I cannot reproduce sig_info_t bug and I do not have more
54: information.
1.1 bertrand 55: - NetBSD 4.0 and above on other architecture than sparc32 with restriction
56: due to sigpending bug.
57: - Mac OS X.
58:
59: Any information about RPL/2 on these last operating systems are welcome.
60:
61: * RPL/2 is not supported on :
62:
63: - OpenBSD due to a major bug in sigaltstack syscall when a program is
64: linked with -lthread. As this bug comes from OpenBSD libraries,
65: OpenBSD port has to wait for a fixed sigaltstack.
1.2 bertrand 66: - OpenVMS (work in progress) on Alpha and Integrity due to some bugs in GNV.
67: RPL/2 never works on OpenVMS VAX because GNV is too old on this
68: architecture.
69: - Hurd.
1.1 bertrand 70:
71: * RPL/2 shall never be supported on :
72:
73: - Cygwin due to some troubles between Cygwin Posix subsystem and Windows.
74: You can try, but I shall never support Cygwin. If someone proposes
75: patches to build RPL/2 on Cygwin, I won't modify official RPL/2 source
76: tree, but only propose these patches against official tarball.
77: - Windows (all versions).
78: - OS/2 and eComStation.
79: - Mac OS preX.
80:
81: Tools directory contains some libraries that are normally provided by
82: all Posix systems. These libraries are built during build process
83: and RPL/2 is statically linked with them because I have seen that on
84: several systems, some Posix libraries have strange 'features'...
85:
86: On all systems, you must install GNU make and you should install
87: gcc/g++/gfortran (minimal release : 4.0.0). It is possible to build
88: RPL/2 with some other compilers (for example cc and f95 from SunStudio,
89: or cc and f95 from Digital^WCompaq^WHP) but I do not test all potential
90: combinaisons.
91:
92: * 64 bits on Solaris (are you sure that you need 64bits wide RPL/2 ?)
93:
94: You have to configure RPL/2 with some user defined variables.
95:
96: CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -m64" CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -m64" FCFLAGS="$FCFLAGS -m64" \
97: FFLAGS="$FFLAGS -m64" LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -m64" ./configure (options)
98:
99: If you want to use mysql or postgresql support, you should obtain 64bits
100: binary executables, libraries and daemons. PostgreSQL 8.3.5 does not compile
101: on Solaris 10 in 64bits mode with gcc/GNU ld (due to a strange bug, ld
102: tries to build a 32bits wide library with 64bits objects even if -m64 is
103: specified on command line...). I have not tried mysql.
104:
105: If you want to use rplc, you have to use GNU ld, not Solaris ld, due to
106: another bug that avoid symbol exportation. You have to check that rpl
107: is linked with libmtmalloc and not with libmalloc from libc because there
108: is another bug in Solaris' libc : free() can enter in a deadlock
109: (internal locked mutex).
110:
111: Of course, all 64bits libraries have to be accessible by LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
112:
113: tchaikovski:[/usr/shared-apps/bin] > file rpl
114: rpl: ELF 64-bit MSB executable SPARCV9 Version 1, dynamically linked,
115: not stripped
116:
117: Very easy^Wnice, isn't it ?
118:
119: J. Bertrand <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>
CVSweb interface <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>